Key Specifications

SpecificationLlama 3.1 405BMistral Large 2
Vendormetamistral
Version3.1-405blarge-2
Release Date2024-07-232024-07-24
Context Window128000 tokens128000 tokens
Input Modalitiestexttext
Output Modalitiestexttext
LicenseLlama 3 Community LicenseMistral Research License
SOC2
HIPAA
GDPR
ISO 27001

Benchmark Results

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 405BMistral Large 2Winner
BBH82.981Llama 3.1 405B
GSM8K89.293Mistral Large 2
HUMANEVAL8992Mistral Large 2
MATH73.871Llama 3.1 405B
MMLU88.684Llama 3.1 405B

Pricing Comparison

Tier (per Mtok)Llama 3.1 405BMistral Large 2
Input$5$2
Output$15$6
Cache Read$0$0
Cache Write$0$0

Llama 3.1 405B contra Mistral Large 2

Descripción del modelo

Llama 3.1 405B and Mistral Large 2 are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.

Especificaciones clave

ProveedorFecha de lanzamientoVentana de contextoLicencia
Meta / Mistral2024-07-23 / 2024-07-24128K / 128KLlama 3 Community License / Mistral Research License

Rendimiento en benchmarks

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 405BMistral Large 2Ganador
BBH (BIG-Bench Hard)82.981.0A
GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K)89.293.0B
HumanEval89.092.0B
MATH73.871.0A
MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding)88.684.0A

Comparación de precios

EntradaSalidaLectura cachéEscritura caché
— / —— / —— / —— / —

por millón de tokens — A / B

Fortalezas & Debilidades

Llama 3.1 405B

  • ✅ MMLU score 88.6, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 89.0, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 89.2, robust math reasoning.
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

Mistral Large 2

  • ✅ MMLU score 84.0, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 92.0, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 93.0, robust math reasoning.
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

Opinión del editor

Llama 3.1 405B and Mistral Large 2 each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.

Preguntas frecuentes

Which model is better for coding tasks?

Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.

Which model is cheaper?

Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.

Which has a longer context window?

Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.

Referencias

Editor's Take

See Editor's Take section.