Key Specifications

SpecificationGPT-4GPT-4 Turbo
Vendoropenaiopenai
Version4turbo
Release Date2023-03-142023-11-06
Context Window8192 tokens128000 tokens
Input Modalitiestexttext, image
Output Modalitiestexttext
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
SOC2
HIPAA
GDPR
ISO 27001

Benchmark Results

BenchmarkGPT-4GPT-4 TurboWinner
ARC94.194.2GPT-4 Turbo
BBH80.978.5GPT-4
GPQA39.249.2GPT-4 Turbo
GSM8K91.785.2GPT-4
HUMANEVAL77.680.5GPT-4 Turbo
IFEVAL74.677.9GPT-4 Turbo
MATH43.950.9GPT-4 Turbo
MMLU85.884.4GPT-4
MUSR54.661.1GPT-4 Turbo
WINOGRANDE80.380.8GPT-4 Turbo

Pricing Comparison

Tier (per Mtok)GPT-4GPT-4 Turbo
Input$30$10
Output$60$30
Cache Read$0$0
Cache Write$0$0

GPT-4 contra GPT-4 Turbo

Visão geral do modelo

GPT-4 and GPT-4 Turbo are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.

Especificações principais

FornecedorData de lançamentoJanela de contextoLicença
Openai / Openai2023-03-14 / 2023-11-068K / 128KProprietary / Proprietary

Desempenho em benchmarks

BenchmarkGPT-4GPT-4 TurboVencedor
ARC94.194.2Tie
BBH (BIG-Bench Hard)80.978.5A
GPQA39.249.2B
GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K)91.785.2A
HumanEval77.680.5B
IFEval74.677.9B
MATH43.950.9B
MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding)85.884.4A
MUSR54.661.1B
WinoGrande80.380.8B

Comparação de preços

EntradaSaídaLeitura de cacheEscrita de cache
— / —— / —— / —— / —

por milhão de tokens — A / B

Pontos fortes & Pontos fracos

GPT-4

  • ✅ MMLU score 85.8, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ GSM8K 91.7, robust math reasoning.
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。
  • ⚠️ 上下文窗口 8K 偏小。

GPT-4 Turbo

  • ✅ MMLU score 84.4, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 80.5, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 85.2, robust math reasoning.
  • ✅ 支持文本、图像、音频多模态输入。
  • ✅ 上下文窗口 128K,支持长文本。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

Opinião do editor

GPT-4 and GPT-4 Turbo each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.

Perguntas frequentes

Which model is better for coding tasks?

Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.

Which model is cheaper?

Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.

Which has a longer context window?

Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.

Referências

Editor's Take

See Editor's Take section.