Key Specifications

SpecificationGPT-4oClaude 3.5 Haiku
Vendoropenaianthropic
Version4o3.5-haiku
Release Date2024-05-132024-11-04
Context Window128000 tokens200000 tokens
Input Modalitiestext, image, audiotext, image
Output Modalitiestext, audiotext
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
SOC2
HIPAA
GDPR
ISO 27001

Benchmark Results

BenchmarkGPT-4oClaude 3.5 HaikuWinner
ARC91.8Claude 3.5 Haiku
BBH83.170.2GPT-4o
GPQA31.1Claude 3.5 Haiku
GSM8K95.875.5GPT-4o
HUMANEVAL90.273.8GPT-4o
IFEVAL73.6Claude 3.5 Haiku
MATH76.653GPT-4o
MMLU88.777.6GPT-4o
MUSR52.3Claude 3.5 Haiku
WINOGRANDE83.8Claude 3.5 Haiku

Pricing Comparison

Tier (per Mtok)GPT-4oClaude 3.5 Haiku
Input$2.5$0.8
Output$10$4
Cache Read$1.25$0
Cache Write$2.5$0

GPT-4o contra Claude 3.5 Haiku

Visão geral do modelo

GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Haiku are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.

Especificações principais

FornecedorData de lançamentoJanela de contextoLicença
Openai / Anthropic2024-05-13 / 2024-11-04128K / 200KProprietary / Proprietary

Desempenho em benchmarks

BenchmarkGPT-4oClaude 3.5 HaikuVencedor
ARC91.8B
BBH (BIG-Bench Hard)83.170.2A
GPQA31.1B
GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K)95.875.5A
HumanEval90.273.8A
IFEval73.6B
MATH76.653.0A
MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding)88.777.6A
MUSR52.3B
WinoGrande83.8B

Comparação de preços

EntradaSaídaLeitura de cacheEscrita de cache
— / —— / —— / —— / —

por milhão de tokens — A / B

Pontos fortes & Pontos fracos

GPT-4o

  • ✅ MMLU score 88.7, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 90.2, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 95.8, robust math reasoning.
  • ✅ 支持文本、图像、音频多模态输入。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

Claude 3.5 Haiku

  • ✅ 可靠的通用模型。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

Opinião do editor

GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Haiku each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.

Perguntas frequentes

Which model is better for coding tasks?

Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.

Which model is cheaper?

Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.

Which has a longer context window?

Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.

Referências

Editor's Take

See Editor's Take section.