Qwen2.5 72B vs DeepSeek V3: Benchmark Comparison
Detailed comparison of Qwen2.5 72B and DeepSeek V3 covering benchmarks, pricing, context window, and compliance.
Key Specifications
| Specification | Qwen2.5 72B | DeepSeek V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | alibaba | deepseek |
| Version | 2.5-72b | v3 |
| Release Date | 2024-09-19 | 2024-12-26 |
| Context Window | 131072 tokens | 64000 tokens |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
| License | Qwen License | DeepSeek License |
| SOC2 | ✗ | ✗ |
| HIPAA | ✗ | ✗ |
| GDPR | ✗ | ✗ |
| ISO 27001 | ✗ | ✗ |
Benchmark Results
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 72B | DeepSeek V3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| BBH | 82.4 | 84.9 | DeepSeek V3 |
| GSM8K | 88.4 | 89.3 | DeepSeek V3 |
| HUMANEVAL | 86.6 | 82.6 | Qwen2.5 72B |
| MATH | 83.1 | 61.6 | Qwen2.5 72B |
| MMLU | 86.1 | 88.5 | DeepSeek V3 |
Pricing Comparison
| Tier (per Mtok) | Qwen2.5 72B | DeepSeek V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Input | $0.5 | $0.27 |
| Output | $0.8 | $1.1 |
| Cache Read | $0 | $0.07 |
| Cache Write | $0 | $0.27 |
Qwen2.5 72B contra DeepSeek V3
Visão geral do modelo
Qwen2.5 72B and DeepSeek V3 are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.
Especificações principais
| Fornecedor | Data de lançamento | Janela de contexto | Licença |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alibaba / Deepseek | 2024-09-19 / 2024-12-26 | 131K / 64K | Qwen License / DeepSeek License |
Desempenho em benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 72B | DeepSeek V3 | Vencedor |
|---|---|---|---|
| BBH (BIG-Bench Hard) | 82.4 | 84.9 | B |
| GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K) | 88.4 | 89.3 | B |
| HumanEval | 86.6 | 82.6 | A |
| MATH | 83.1 | 61.6 | A |
| MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) | 86.1 | 88.5 | B |
Comparação de preços
| Entrada | Saída | Leitura de cache | Escrita de cache |
|---|---|---|---|
| — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
por milhão de tokens — A / B
Pontos fortes & Pontos fracos
Qwen2.5 72B
- ✅ MMLU score 86.1, strong knowledge reasoning.
- ✅ HumanEval 86.6, excellent code generation.
- ✅ GSM8K 88.4, robust math reasoning.
- ⚠️ 闭源专有模型，不支持自托管。
DeepSeek V3
- ✅ MMLU score 88.5, strong knowledge reasoning.
- ✅ HumanEval 82.6, excellent code generation.
- ✅ GSM8K 89.3, robust math reasoning.
- ✅ 采用 MoE 混合专家架构。
- ⚠️ 闭源专有模型，不支持自托管。
Opinião do editor
Qwen2.5 72B and DeepSeek V3 each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.
Perguntas frequentes
Which model is better for coding tasks?
Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.
Which model is cheaper?
Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.
Which has a longer context window?
Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.
Referências
Editor's Take
See Editor's Take section.